Section 1: Graduate Program Advising & Governance
1.1 Faculty Core Advisors & Performance Standards
When a student has been admitted to the Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, a student is assigned a "core BME faculty advisor" from among the departmental faculty. This “core advisor” is a BME faculty member who serves as an academic advising contact, different from the staff person most students consulted in undergraduate years. A “core advisor” may double as the student's research advisor. Core advisors provide in-depth course advice and referrals, or they may function as a sounding board or to help a student brainstorm. They periodically may be asked by the BMEGSC to evaluate a student's academic performance to assess reasonable progress, though it is the student’s responsibility to initiate contact and request feedback on goals and performance. Students are encouraged to make regular contact with these assigned faculty resources and are welcome to switch to another faculty member as stronger, more natural relationships develop over time.
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF EXTRA MENTORSHIP
1.2 Maintaining Satisfactory Academic Standing
To be in good academic standing in the Graduate School, a student must maintain a graduate cumulative point-hour ratio (CPHR) of 3.0 or higher in all graduate credit coursework and must maintain reasonable progress toward degree requirements. Achieving this requires open communication with research advisors; the establishment of clear expectations; and a necessary balance among research, coursework, and wellbeing.
Sources used to judge reasonable progress include:
- Cumulative point-hour ratio
- Research advisor’s/core contact’s recommendations
- Thesis or dissertation committee members' recommendations
- The PhD Student Annual Review form
A student’s research advisor and/or core advisor should apprise the BMEGSC of any student judged not to be making reasonable progress. If the BMEGSC concurs, the student will be notified of such in writing, with an explanation of the reasons for this judgment; actions that the student can take to remedy the situation; and a time limit for rectification. The time limit in most cases will be no less than two terms.
Failure to maintain reasonable progress will result in a recommendation to the Graduate School by the BMEGSC that the student be denied further registration in the program. This type of break has been known to help students in academic trouble by providing a mandatory opportunity to prioritize wellness. A request to be re-instated can be made by the student at a future time, when the student is in a better position to succeed.
A doctoral student who has had two unsatisfactory attempts at the Candidacy Examination or the Final Oral Examination or Professional Doctoral Examination is not considered to be in good academic standing and may be dismissed from the program per Graduate School rules.
1.3 Selecting a Research Advisor
Participating graduate faculty (many from outside departments and colleges) have diverse research interests and act as research advisors to graduate students, along with those who call Biomedical Engineering their home unit. While the student’s assigned core advisor fulfills a sort of “helper” role, the research advisor is the main advisor and mentor (and often also functions as Graduate Research Associate or GRA supervisor). When a research advisor is new or from an outside unit, a student’s core advisor can be an invaluable resource for advice on BME culture and practices.
Research advisors and students will work together to define research projects and to develop the program of study and to form an advisory (i.e., examination) committee. For an MS student, the research advisor chairs the MS Examination Committee. For a PhD student, the research advisor chairs the Candidacy Examination Committee and the Final Oral Examination Committee.
Selecting a research advisor is one of the most important decisions students will make during the course of their graduate career. It is important that students take time when choosing their research advisors because they will be a key component in a student’s success at the graduate level. It is important to be aware of a research advisor’s working style. Talking with current students who work in faculty labs and asking questions about style, funding, and expectations can help new students make proper choices.
Students are strongly encouraged to begin seeking an advisor and research project as soon as possible. Sometimes this automatically happens as a result of funding and project connections made early in the admission process. Others (e.g., fellowship recipients, etc.) may choose to do informal rotations in multiple faculty labs before identifying a research advisor. Regardless, students should select an advisor by the end of their second term of enrollment in the graduate program.
The research advisor of a master’s student must hold membership at the Category M level or higher in Biomedical Engineering. The research advisor of a doctoral student must hold membership at the Category P level in Biomedical Engineering. Questions about graduate faculty status may be directed to the Graduate Studies Office.
For details on graduate faculty duties and responsibilities, see Section 12, GSH.
Q: How does a Faculty Member get Graduate Faculty Status?
If a faculty member with whom you seek to work does not have graduate faculty status, they can apply for it by writing a letter addressed to the BME Graduate Studies Chair along with a current CV, emailed to the Graduate Studies Coordinator for consideration at the next convened BMEGSC meeting. Letters should include a statement of the faculty member’s goals in working with BME graduate students; ability to fund graduate students; and past graduate or engineering advising experience. Graduate Faculty requests are processed 2-3 times per year.
1.4 Student Responsibility
Students are responsible for developing programs of study and forming their necessary faculty committees, and for seeking input from faculty core faculty and research advisors. It is the responsibility of the student to enlist the participation of faculty on their committees and to consult with their faculty advisors on a regular basis. It is the graduate student’s responsibility to know and follow all departmental and university procedures and deadlines and to submit all BMEGSC requests for approval in a timely fashion, anticipating delays during busier points in the academic year.
Interaction between students and their research advisors will vary. Some may have daily contact and others may consult weekly or even less frequently. To ensure that degree requirements will be met efficiently, remember to be proactive and see your research advisor and/or core advisor regularly to:
- Discuss concerns, your research project, opportunities, and problems
- Ask for help to determine your course schedule
- Get approval for projects
- Get ideas and coordinate plans to apply for external funding and fellowships
- Initiate the PhD Student Annual Review form and review with advisor/core contact (for PhDs only)
PhD Annual Review Forms are due to the Graduate Studies Office by July 1 each year. Students must complete them with their research advisor and/or core faculty advisor. All must sign to verify that a review has taken place. The purpose of this exercise is to provide an opportunity to reflect on progress, make changes, and set new goals.
For more information on good standing and responsible student conduct, see Section 5, GSH.
Not all research advisors are GRA supervisors, but often they are the same person. Below is a reminder of the different roles you and your faculty supervisor may hold.
1.5 Biomedical Engineering Graduate Studies Committee (BMEGSC)
The graduate programs in Biomedical Engineering are administered and governed by the Biomedical Engineering Graduate Studies Committee (BMEGSC) under the guidance of the Graduate School and Faculty. They are the local body that reviews & approves academic and curricular matters at the Department level before we send them on to the Graduate School, the Office of Graduate Admissions, or the Registrar (i.e., the University level).
The BMEGSC must approve all admissions, funding arrangements, proposed programs of study and faculty composition and membership of all examination committees required by the Graduate School. They review faculty requests for “graduate faculty status” as well as anonymous program assessment information gathered via faculty and student surveys.
The 8-10 faculty members and Chair of this committee are appointed by the Department Chair from the departmental and participating graduate faculty in Biomedical Engineering. The membership includes the Graduate Program Coordinator and a student representative (an elected BMEGSA Officer) who along with the Graduate Coordinator acts as a liaison between the student body and the committee. The Chairperson of the BMEGSC authorizes the business of the committee, which meets regularly throughout the year to fulfill the responsibilities delegated to it by the Graduate School (see Section 13, GSH). The Graduate Studies Coordinator assists the BMEGSC, graduate students, and tracks agenda items.
Students who have communicated with their core and faculty advisors about problems may bring requests and concerns directly to the attention of the BMEGSC for their advice and consideration by a larger body. Requests about course waivers or substitutions must always be accompanied by a proposed program of study, along with the requisite syllabi. For details on preparing the Program of Study, see section 3 of this Handbook. Correspondence addressed to the “Chair of the BME Graduate Studies Committee” should be directed to the Graduate Studies Coordinator by email at least one full week in advance of any scheduled meeting. Meetings typically are held once monthly and business agendas fill quickly.
1.6 BMEGSC Seasonal Working Calendar: Autumn through Spring
When submitting requests to the BMEGSC, students should be aware of the seasonal BMEGSC workload. The committee’s primary business typically falls as listed below.
- DEC-FEB: Review and make admission decisions on applications;
- JAN-MAR: Make funding connections, prepare fellowship nominations and events; Visit day
- MAR-MAY: Review student proposed programs of study and/or transfer requests;
- JUN-JULY: No BMEGSC meetings; annual reviews; orientation; revisions
- AUG-MAY: Evaluate individual requests for unplanned exceptions to program requirements, review graduate faculty status, manage graduate assessment, review curriculum, and much more.
- SEPT-NOV: Recruitment; GEOH; BMES; scheduling issues
WHERE TO FIND HELP IN BME:
FIRST-LINE RESOURCES & CONTACTS FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS
-
Graduate Program Coordinator, Melanie Senitko – senitko.1
-
Core Advisor, Research Advisor, or Graduate Studies Chair, Jun Liu – liu.314
-
BMEGSA Officers, Current Students, or Graduate Program Coordinator, Melanie Senitko – senitko.1
- The HR staff person who is helpoing with your Workday appt. In BME it may be Leigh Zircher -- ZIrcher.6 or Catrena Collins -- Collins.424; If not hired thru BME, you must work with your GRA Supervisor’s HR officer
-
Josh Pryor -- Pryor.102
- Rebecca Hudgins -- Hudgins.18
-
Josh Pryor -- Pryor.102
-
submit an ETS work ticket here
Handbook
Section 1: Graduate Program Advising & Governance
Section 2: Registration and Enrollment Basics
Section 4: BME Thesis-MS Curriculum Requirements
Section 5: Thesis-MS Committee and Examinations
Section 6: BME Non-Thesis-MS Curriculum Requirements
Section 7: Non-Thesis MS Committees and Culminating Experience
Section 8: BME PhD Curriculum Requirements
Section 9: PhD Candidacy Examination: Overview, Committee, and Process
Section 10: PhD Dissertation Defense: Final Oral Examination Overview, Committee, and Process
Section 11: Combined Medical Scientist Training Program: MD/PhD Degree
Section 12: Combined BS/MS Program in BME
Section 13: Funding Sources and Policies
Section 14: Student Organizations, University Services & Wellness Resources
Section 15: Development of Ethics in Scholarly Activities
Appendix A: List of Graduate Course Suggestions for Programs of Study
Appendix B: PhD Program Template
Appendix C: Thesis MS Program Template
Appendix D: Non-thesis MS Program Template
Appendix E: PhD Timeline: Completing degree requirements
Appendix F: MS Timeline: Completing degree requirements
Appendix G: PhD Graduation Tool
Appendix H: MS Graduation Tool
Appendix I: Admission Prerequisites for Non-engineers
Appendix J: Department Mission